<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analogue vs Digital.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/</link>
	<description>a method towards bethlehem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aboonoo</title>
		<link>http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>aboonoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>i didnt understand a word of it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didnt understand a word of it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Digital is far too critical of the analogue domain, so a digital sinewave will never contain true energy. Richard has made use of the awareness being the point where digital and analogue may co-exist, but again, the critical path is less inherently fallible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital is far too critical of the analogue domain, so a digital sinewave will never contain true energy. Richard has made use of the awareness being the point where digital and analogue may co-exist, but again, the critical path is less inherently fallible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tibbs</title>
		<link>http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Tibbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>moog modular #1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>moog modular #1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cast</title>
		<link>http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The digital signal doesn&#039;t always have an origin in the analog domain, so it can&#039;t become a critic of the analog. If what you say is true, then the digital becomes recurring only at the point of self-awareness, but that doesn&#039;t really answer the question. Sorry I couldn&#039;t be of more help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The digital signal doesn&#8217;t always have an origin in the analog domain, so it can&#8217;t become a critic of the analog. If what you say is true, then the digital becomes recurring only at the point of self-awareness, but that doesn&#8217;t really answer the question. Sorry I couldn&#8217;t be of more help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

