http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/ a method towards bethlehem Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:30:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-13 aboonoo Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:29:54 +0000 http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-13 i didnt understand a word of it i didnt understand a word of it

]]> http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-6 admin Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:26:44 +0000 http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-6 Digital is far too critical of the analogue domain, so a digital sinewave will never contain true energy. Richard has made use of the awareness being the point where digital and analogue may co-exist, but again, the critical path is less inherently fallible. Digital is far too critical of the analogue domain, so a digital sinewave will never contain true energy. Richard has made use of the awareness being the point where digital and analogue may co-exist, but again, the critical path is less inherently fallible.

]]> http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-4 Tibbs Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:36:21 +0000 http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-4 moog modular #1 moog modular #1

]]> http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-3 Richard Cast Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:38:57 +0000 http://phlex.com/2007/08/12/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-3 The digital signal doesn't always have an origin in the analog domain, so it can't become a critic of the analog. If what you say is true, then the digital becomes recurring only at the point of self-awareness, but that doesn't really answer the question. Sorry I couldn't be of more help. The digital signal doesn’t always have an origin in the analog domain, so it can’t become a critic of the analog. If what you say is true, then the digital becomes recurring only at the point of self-awareness, but that doesn’t really answer the question. Sorry I couldn’t be of more help.

]]>